ACCOMPAGNEMENTS FORMATIFS POUR LES ÉQUIPES DU SECTEUR PUBLIC
Cost Per Notch Redux
What Every Girl Should Know
What Every Girl Should Know
Setting Boundaries With Your Partner
Managing Stress at the End of a Relationship
Valentine’s Day: A Date Which Will Live In Infamy
The Importance of Trust in a Family
Let Go of Your Past to Heat Up Your Present Relationship
The Hottest Kiss in the History of Earth
It’s a Fling Thing
Looking for Love This Summer?
1. OP vs. Comments: Source of Discord?
The OP: I read it in a literal, straightforward manner and I noted that Jeremy describes reciprocal opportunities and downsides to dating. I was quite hard on Jeremy in my original post; in my effort to illustrate some of my objections, I used examples — examples Jeremy believes show us to be on the same page. The same page would, to me, disagree with the OP. Namely, I do not think that men and women equally assume responsibility for dating or relationship success (there is no equivalent to AFBB for men); I do not think women have to assume responsibility for relationship success (they have the law and culture on their side, and know it);
I do not think men and women equally absorb risk in the SMP. Therefore I struggle mightily to accept this sentence from the OP:
“From there, individuals with comparable value and interest can “court”.” Or this sentence: “In fact, their advice is two sides to the same coin.” Throughout he expresses as well his confidence in the existence of some sort of intersexual level playing field; this is affirmed in his use of words such as “both”, “equally”, “comparable”, or the phrase “two sides to the same coin.”
I believe this is where the discussion jumps the rails and some of us lose our shit — not at Jeremy’s reasonableness of tone and intent, and not because we question his motives. It jumps the rails because his very discussion describes a level playing field in which people of like mind and equivalent impulse, if they are careful and tiptoe through the dating landscape like a scout approaching a ‘dead dog’ (i.e., booby-trapped carcass) on the side of a road in AfPak, reach a place of calm and mutual support. No. This is where I, and, for example, brother Ton, break out in hives.
What Every Girl Should Know
What Every Girl Should Know
Setting Boundaries With Your Partner
Managing Stress at the End of a Relationship
Valentine’s Day: A Date Which Will Live In Infamy
The Importance of Trust in a Family
Let Go of Your Past to Heat Up Your Present Relationship
The Hottest Kiss in the History of Earth
It’s a Fling Thing
Looking for Love This Summer?
1. OP vs. Comments: Source of Discord?
The OP: I read it in a literal, straightforward manner and I noted that Jeremy describes reciprocal opportunities and downsides to dating. I was quite hard on Jeremy in my original post; in my effort to illustrate some of my objections, I used examples — examples Jeremy believes show us to be on the same page. The same page would, to me, disagree with the OP. Namely, I do not think that men and women equally assume responsibility for dating or relationship success (there is no equivalent to AFBB for men); I do not think women have to assume responsibility for relationship success (they have the law and culture on their side, and know it);
I do not think men and women equally absorb risk in the SMP. Therefore I struggle mightily to accept this sentence from the OP:
“From there, individuals with comparable value and interest can “court”.” Or this sentence: “In fact, their advice is two sides to the same coin.” Throughout he expresses as well his confidence in the existence of some sort of intersexual level playing field; this is affirmed in his use of words such as “both”, “equally”, “comparable”, or the phrase “two sides to the same coin.”
I believe this is where the discussion jumps the rails and some of us lose our shit — not at Jeremy’s reasonableness of tone and intent, and not because we question his motives. It jumps the rails because his very discussion describes a level playing field in which people of like mind and equivalent impulse, if they are careful and tiptoe through the dating landscape like a scout approaching a ‘dead dog’ (i.e., booby-trapped carcass) on the side of a road in AfPak, reach a place of calm and mutual support. No. This is where I, and, for example, brother Ton, break out in hives.
