ACCOMPAGNEMENTS FORMATIFS POUR LES ÉQUIPES DU SECTEUR PUBLIC
https://usa-girls.jouwstartonline.nl/
https://usa-girls.toplinkjes.com/
https://usa-girls.handigestart.nl/
https://usa-girls.sellerconnect.de/
https://usa-girls.koalahilfe.de/
https://usa-girls.jougids.nl/
https://usa-girls.vindhier.com/
https://usa-girls.vindnu.com/
https://usa-girls.linkmolen.nl/
The post aims to settle something that is presented as unsettled, to right some wrongs, but what happens if the material take off’s are not challenged, confirmed? What gets built?
The argument desires to paint TFT as an equalizer based on the application of TFT well beyond the point of realistic utility for the purpose of leveling risk/reward from a singular perspective without appropriate regard for the inherent disproportions and and dislocations present within the marketplace.
This is not just about one tool to be applied, there is an aim to stretch this one tool as an overarching “fix” to “manipulation” in “filtering for suiters” in “preying on insecurities” and so on. If this sounds a lot like women not wanting to either buy false goods (get gamed by a beta) or take disproportionate risk, over-invest in alpha (pump and dump), then we might want to explore that. If it is by accident or intent, it matters not, feelings have no place; this is not a personal anecdote on trial.
Any hostility – at least from me, is in the intellectual dishonesty; the very same kind I would level at those progressives who want me to not only ignore their unprincipled exceptions, but to help them construct a temple upon them. This is no more hostile than a scalpel incising a tumor from healthy tissue.
The real danger is when the fruits borne from poisonous trees are allowed to set upon fertile ground for too long. This isn’t academia, where any criticism against the sacred premises are viewed as invective. If this is iterative, then all the better. Address and redress, but I sense that this is more about men “not understanding”, “not getting it”, and otherwise rejecting ideas because misogyny or whatever. Cue the subtle shaming of ‘hostility’ in tone thus disqualifying content. Also seem familiar?
https://usa-girls.toplinkjes.com/
https://usa-girls.handigestart.nl/
https://usa-girls.sellerconnect.de/
https://usa-girls.koalahilfe.de/
https://usa-girls.jougids.nl/
https://usa-girls.vindhier.com/
https://usa-girls.vindnu.com/
https://usa-girls.linkmolen.nl/
The post aims to settle something that is presented as unsettled, to right some wrongs, but what happens if the material take off’s are not challenged, confirmed? What gets built?
The argument desires to paint TFT as an equalizer based on the application of TFT well beyond the point of realistic utility for the purpose of leveling risk/reward from a singular perspective without appropriate regard for the inherent disproportions and and dislocations present within the marketplace.
This is not just about one tool to be applied, there is an aim to stretch this one tool as an overarching “fix” to “manipulation” in “filtering for suiters” in “preying on insecurities” and so on. If this sounds a lot like women not wanting to either buy false goods (get gamed by a beta) or take disproportionate risk, over-invest in alpha (pump and dump), then we might want to explore that. If it is by accident or intent, it matters not, feelings have no place; this is not a personal anecdote on trial.
Any hostility – at least from me, is in the intellectual dishonesty; the very same kind I would level at those progressives who want me to not only ignore their unprincipled exceptions, but to help them construct a temple upon them. This is no more hostile than a scalpel incising a tumor from healthy tissue.
The real danger is when the fruits borne from poisonous trees are allowed to set upon fertile ground for too long. This isn’t academia, where any criticism against the sacred premises are viewed as invective. If this is iterative, then all the better. Address and redress, but I sense that this is more about men “not understanding”, “not getting it”, and otherwise rejecting ideas because misogyny or whatever. Cue the subtle shaming of ‘hostility’ in tone thus disqualifying content. Also seem familiar?