Aller au contenu principal

ACCOMPAGNEMENTS FORMATIFS POUR LES ÉQUIPES DU SECTEUR PUBLIC

Cost Per Notch Redux
What Every Girl Should Know
What Every Girl Should Know
Setting Boundaries With Your Partner
Managing Stress at the End of a Relationship
Valentine’s Day: A Date Which Will Live In Infamy
The Importance of Trust in a Family
Let Go of Your Past to Heat Up Your Present Relationship
The Hottest Kiss in the History of Earth
It’s a Fling Thing
Looking for Love This Summer?

August 16, 2014 at 9:57 am
@Spawny Get 726,

YES and I do like your analogy. I just skipped town instead though because neither the mob nor the casino are required in my life.

Yes, that is a viable third option. When it comes down to it, the powers that be are more concerned about all men who are just dropping out in one way or another, deliberately or not, than those who actively protest against the system.

732
theasdgamer says:
August 16, 2014 at 10:17 am
One thing that some people perhaps overlook is that courting and the investment of resources in dating doesn’t stop once a LTR is established. It may increase. If we assume that dating is a necessary part of romance, and romance is part of a man’s lifestyle, then the expenditure of resources for dating is an ongoing cost whether in a LTR or not. As I explain in my post, Sexual Macrodynamics, romance in a relationship is an ongoing process that requires renewing and has cyclical elements. Breaking rapport, signaling, approach, 5h1t-testing, and investing resources in dating are repeated many times in a relationship.

So, it seems unnatural for men seeking romance to aim for a strategy that invests too little resources in romance merely because of risk. Really, if the expenditure on romance is ongoing and known, then there is no real risk to financial resources. Time will also be an ongoing cost for romance. The main risk is getting no sex because an invalid romantic target was chosen.